Researchers frequently employ standardized instruments to collect data associated with a variable of interest. In such cases, it is helpful to have
served in the role of participant before making research decisions relating to measurement. If researchers are able to identify with and put
themselves in the place of the participant while designing research methods, the participation can have a positive impact. For example, as the
researcher, it might make sense to include a lot of instruments in the same packet for participants to complete so that you can get as much data as
possible. However, if you have completed instruments yourself and can put yourself in the place of the participant, you might realize that
participants can become tired and pay less attention to items or even stop responding when they have to complete too many instruments. In such
cases, there might be missing or misleading data, which is not helpful to you as the researcher.
To gain a greater understanding of the perspective of the participant, you will complete several quantitative instruments relating to your
experience as a doctoral student at Northcentral University. Please answer each completely and honestly.
As you learned in this course, phenomena can be investigated using quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methodologies based on the problem under
investigation, the purpose, and the corresponding research questions. Therefore, you will also answer open-ended questions that tap into the same
constructs as the questionnaires that you completed. This will offer you experience as a participant in collecting qualitative data as well as
demonstrate how phenomena can be explored using varied methodologies. However, it is worth noting that collecting qualitative data electronically
comes with a number of limitations that should always be strongly considered when determining whether to collect qualitative data in person or not.
Please use this link to complete the measurement part of this assignment: Survey
Based on your experiences in completing this assignment, address the following:
What did you think of the length of each survey instrument? Was there a point at which you began to feel tired or paid less attention to the items?
What did you think of the open-ended questions? Were they clear? Did they seem leading? Did they seem concise or too wordy?
Did you prefer completing the closed questions (or multiple-choice questions) or the open-ended questions? Why?
Which methodology do you believe is most useful in the examination of each variable/construct? Why?
How might this experience influence you when designing your own research?
Finally, write a 1-2 page reflection regarding your views on what you see would be the strengths and challenges of using a mixed method design.
Consider how the two mini proposals might be combined to form a mixed method study and what would be the benefits and / or loss if a mixed methods
approach was utilized. Make sure to justify your statements and use the resources to help support your points.
Length: 5-7 pages, not including title and reference pages
Grading Rubric
Criteria
Content (6 points)
Points
1
Completed the survey and provided feedback on the length of each instrument
2
2
Analyzed the use of open-ended and closed questions
2
3
Justified which methodology was most useful in examination each variable/construct
2
Organization (4 points)
4
Organized and presented in a clear manner. Included a minimum of five scholarly references, with appropriate APA formatting applied to citations and
paraphrasing.
4
Total
10
Your paper should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts presented in the course by providing new thoughts and insights
relating directly to this topic. Your response should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards.
WE ARE THE LEADING ACADEMIC ASSIGNMENTS WRITING COMPANY, BUY THIS ASSIGNMENT OR ANY OTHER ASSIGNMENT FROM US AND WE WILL GUARANTEE AN A+ GRADE
