1. Choose 3 different types of evidence from chapter 9 (USE ballistics, blood and body fluids, and fingerprints). Discuss the importance of each, how an investigator would collect each, and determines the admissibility as acceptable evidence.
2. Compare and contrast the tests used by courts to determine the admissibility of expert witness testimony.
3. What is meant by “abuse of discretion”.
Please do all three questions in separate paragraphs.
==========

Short Essay Topic: Historians have often characterized ancient civilizations as either primary or secondary civilizations, or as what I would call hydraulic or non-hydraulic civilizations. Hydraulic civilizations are those that have had to learn how to manage and control the movement of water and in this regard, Mesopotamian, Egyptian, Indian and Chinese civilizations have been called hydraulic or primary civilizations. On the other hand, we have Greek and Roman civilization, which are largely derivative (secondary) civilizations that did not depend on managing the movement of water. What influences did geography and environment have on developing civilizations? How might geography and environment influenced things like society, human thought, politics, and religious beliefs? This question requires that you take a comparative approach and consider the Ancient Near East (also called Western Asia) as well as Egypt, India, China, Greece and Rome.Completed essays should be 500 words in length. Please include the following: an appropriate title and tile page; 1″ margins; double-space Times New Roman 12pt font; footnotes and bibliography must conform to the Turabian style sheet.======

(Q: What specific role did missionaries and Christianity play in the Spanish conquering of Mesoamerican civilizations? You mentioned this in your paper. Please elaborate on this topic in the follow up.)

======

Please read these instructions carefully. I absolutely need to have all these questions answered in order to do well.
In your essays use good structure including a title, transition sentences, distinct paragraphs and structure as well as correct grammar and spelling. Content will count for 40 of the total points and the other 10 points will be for proper spelling, grammar and structure. Answer ALL questions within the essay.
Essay Question
1-Describe in detail the history, structure and unique economic and political structure of the E.U.(15 points)
2-In what ways do the nations of the E.U. work together to attempt to create a better quality of life and stronger economy?
3-Be sure to cite specific treaties and criteria important to the EU function and goals.(15 points)
4- How does it compare with the U.S.?(5 points)
5-What, in your view, are its strengths and weaknesses?
======

 

Unlike the Toulmin and Rogerian methods where one side is argued over another, the middle ground argument mediates between two sides of an issue, finding a ‘middle ground’ solution. In other words, this argumentative position seeks to forward a compromise solution between two positions.
For this discussion, choose an issue that you wrote about previously in this course (either your Toulmin or Rogerian essay). Let the class know your previous claim and briefly how you proved this claim in your essay. After this brief review discussion, discuss how you would have approached this particular topic if you were to write a middle ground argument, instead of a Toulmin or Rogerian argument. Would you have adjusted your claim? If so, what sort of adjustment would you need? Would you have to find additional sources about your topic in order to prove this new claim? Is a middle ground solution a more practical solution to your chosen issue?
======

Discuss the several views of the criminal justice system as it currently operates: the process, network and non-system. Do the three justice components (police, courts, corrections) constitute a true system?

====

Discussion of Findings (10 pages): The Discussion of Findings section in a capstone project acts as a bridge between the Literature Review and the Recommendations and Conclusions section. Here you will tell your reader how the literature helps to support your proposal. Analyze all of the information you found and synthesize it into your own thoughts and words (adding your subjective “voice” to the discussion). What major themes emerge or conclusions can you draw from the Lit Review that supports and/or counters your proposal? What does it all mean? If it’s action-oriented, save it for the next section!
The Discussion of the Findings has three major sections: the major findings, comparison of the findings with existing studies, and any limitations of the study. Your entire literature review is composed of found information, much of which exists within some sort of existing study. In addition, there very well may be other researchers who are proposing similar theories to your own, or you may have expanded on someone else’s research altogether. In short – there are existing studies that you must compare yours to.
I indicated 10 sources, but as always it is up to you how many sources is needed for this section.
Let me know if you have any questions.

========

Whilst it may to be too early to identify different pricing of sustainable and non?
sustainable buildings, there is evidence to suggest that “second hand” properties
will become harder to let and have shorter lifecycles as more green buildings come
on stream. Discuss the implications of these findings for property investors,
especially those holding a portfolio of older stock.
=======

Order type: PowerPoint Presentation
Subject: Psychology

Order Description
Activity: Research Findings
Activity Description
Using the topic from Weeks 1 and 2, prepare a PowerPoint presentation suitable for an introductory psychology course that would be offered to undergraduate students.
Your presentation should include the following:
1. Be sure to include a title slide.
2. Introduce your audience to the topic.
3. Provide an overview and background information on the topic.
4. Explain at least three key points about the topic.
5. Discuss at least two research findings presented in your research articles.
6. Summarize the key points.
Incorporate appropriate animations, transitions, and graphics as well as speaker notes for each slide. The speaker notes may be comprised of brief paragraphs or bulleted lists. Speaker’s notes are located underneath the slide itself (where you see “click to add notes”).
Length: 12 slides (without a reference slide/no needed)
Notes Length: 250 words for each slide
Be sure to include citations for quotations and paraphrases on each slide with references in APA format and style where appropriate. No plagiarism
Week 1 and 2 Assignments Topic are attached as well as 7 references.

Order type: Coursework
Subject: Law

Order Description
Assignment 5 “Brown v. the Board of Education”
Read Case 40.3, Johnson Bank v. George Korbaken Company, LLP. 472F.3d 439. Web2006 U.S. App.Lexis 31058 (2006) United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Using the IRAC Method of briefing cases found in the Appendix, prepare a document that outlines the legal aspects of this case.
Many lawsuits against accountants involve liability of accountants to Third Parties. The plaintiffs are Third Parties (e.g., shareholders, bondholders, trade creditors, and banks) who relied on information supplied by the auditor. There are three (3) major rules of liability that a state can adopt in determining whether an accountant is liable in negligence to third parties.
1. The Ultramares doctrine.
2. Section 552 of The Restatement (Second) of Torts.
3. The foreseeability standard.
Write a seven (7) page paper in which you:
1. Summarize the facts associated with Johnson Bank v. George Korbaken Company.
2. Identity the primary and secondary legal question(s) that are under consideration.
3. Prioritize the rules of law that the court will consider in this case.
4. Compile the court’s decision and opinions on the case.
5. Prepare a conclusion for the outcome of the case.
6. Determine how this case may have been treated differently if it had been decided in 2012 instead of 2006.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
• Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
• Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
• Given a business situation, evaluate the various options for resolving a business dispute from a legal perspective and develop an optimal course of action to resolve the dispute.
• Analyze company policies to ensure compliance with key provisions of the major federal laws related to investor protection, equal employment opportunity, consumer protection, and environmental protection.
• Use technology and information resources to research issues in commercial law.
• Write clearly and concisely about commercial law using proper writing mechanics.
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.
Please click here to view the grading rubric.
The assignment will be graded using the following rubric:
Points: 225 Assignment 5: Brown v. the Board of Education
Criteria Unacceptable
Below 70% F Fair
70-79% C Proficient
80-89% B Exemplary
90-100% A
1. Summarize the facts associated with Johnson Bank v. George Korbaken Company.
Weight: 20% Did not submit or incompletely summarized the facts associated with Johnson Bank v. George Korbaken Company. Partially summarized the facts associated with Johnson Bank v. George Korbaken Company. Satisfactorily summarized the facts associated with Johnson Bank v. George Korbaken Company. Thoroughly summarized the facts associated with Johnson Bank v. George Korbaken Company.
2. Identity the primary and secondary legal question(s) that are under consideration.
Weight: 20% Did not submit or incompletely identified the primary and secondary legal question(s) that are under consideration. Partially identified the primary and secondary legal question(s) that are under consideration. Satisfactorily identified the primary and secondary legal question(s) that are under consideration. Thoroughly identified the primary and secondary legal question(s) that are under consideration.
3. Prioritize the rules of law that the court will consider in this case.
Weight: 15% Did not submit or incompletely prioritized the rules of law that the court will consider in this case. Partially prioritized the rules of law that the court will consider in this case. Satisfactorily prioritized the rules of law that the court will consider in this case. Thoroughly prioritized the rules of law that the court will consider in this case.
4. Compile the court’s decision and opinions on the case.
Weight: 15% Did not submit or incompletely compiled the court’s decision and opinions on the case. Partially compiled the court’s decision and opinions on the case. Satisfactorily compiled the court’s decision and opinions on the case. Thoroughly compiled the court’: s decision and opinions on the case.
5. Prepare a conclusion for the outcome of the case.
Weight: 10% Did not submit or incompletely prepared a conclusion for the outcome of the case.
Partially prepared a conclusion for the outcome of the case. Satisfactorily prepared a conclusion for the outcome of the case. Thoroughly prepared a conclusion for the outcome of the case.
6. Determine how this case may have been treated differently if it had been decided in 2012 instead of 2006.
Weight: 10% Did not submit or incompletely determined how this case may have been treated differently if it had been decided in 2012 instead of 2006.
Partially determined how this case may have been treated differently if it had been decided in 2012 instead of 2006.
Satisfactorily determined how this case may have been treated differently if it had been decided in 2012 instead of 2006.
Thoroughly determined how this case may have been treated differently if it had been decided in 2012 instead of 2006.
7. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements
Weight: 10% More than 6 errors present 5-6 errors present 3-4 errors present 0-2 errors present

==============